Performance Evaluation in the Presence of Heterogeneous Indicators in Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case Study on Top Investment Companies of Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of mathematics, Islamic Azad university, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Tehran, Iran.


Evaluating the performance of organizations can provide managers with useful information about the status of the organization compared to other organizations so that managers can take a step towards the growth and excellence of the organization. Obviously, the number of indicators and their amount affect the performance evaluation of organizations. So, by collecting the exact values of the indicators, an accurate and accurate performance evaluation will be provided to managers of organizations. In this article, we intend to evaluate the companies investing in the stock exchange. Since in the table of indices related to these companies published by the Iran Stock Exchange Organization there are indices whose values have been lost for any reason (not available - heterogeneous index), it is necessary to use envelopment analysis models. We used data (DEA) in the presence of heterogeneous indicators. We have used the model of Cook et al.'s (2013) article to evaluate companies. For the conceptual use of research, we have described and implemented their method step by step. Lastly, we have analyzed the results.


1. C. Brown, F. Abraham, Sum of Perpetuities Method for Valuing Stock Prices, Journal of Economics, 38, 59–72 (2012).
2. W. D. Cook, J. Harrison, P. Rouse, J. Zhu, Relative efficiency measurement: The problem of a missing output in a subset of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 220, 79–84 (2012).
3. W. D. Cook, J. Harrison, R. Imanirad, P. Rouse, J. Zhu, Data Envelopment Analysis with Nonhomogeneous DMUs, Operations Research, 61, 666–676 (2013).
4. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2, 429–444 (1978).
5. J. Du, Y. Chen, J. Huo, DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks, Omega 56, 122–132 (2015).
6. K. A. Horcher, Essentials of financial risk management, John Wiley and Sons, 1–3 (2005).
7. J. Wu, L. Mingjun, Z. Qingyuan, Z. Zhixiang, L. Liang, Energy and Environmental Efficiency Measurement of China’s Industrial Sectors: a DEA Model with Non-homogeneous Inputs and Outputs, Energy Economics, 78, 468–480 (2019).
8. X. Ji, J. Wu, Q. Zhu, J. Sun, Using a hybrid heterogeneous dea method to benchmark chinas sustainable urbanization: an empirical study, Analsys of Operations Research, 1–55 (2018).
9. W. Li, L. Liang, W. D. Cook, J. Zhu, DEA models for nonhomogeneous DMUs with different input configurations, European Journal of Operational Research, 254, 946–956 (2016).
10. A. Mohamadi, K. Mohamadi, M. Jahanbani, Improvement of Efficiency Measurement in DEA Model By Applying GRA Technique, General Management Research, 17, 135–152 (2012).
11. A. J. MciNel, R. Frey, P. Embrechts, Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools, Princeton University Press, 2–3 (2005).
12. V. V. Podinovski, O. B. Olesen, C. S. Sarrico, Nonparametric production technologies with multiple component processes, Operations Research, 66, 282–300 (2017).
13. R. G. Thompson, P. S. Dharmapala, Thrall RM Importance for DEA of zeros in data, multipliers, and solutions, J. Production Anal., 4, 379–390 (1993).
14. J. Walter, Dividend Policies and Common Stock Prices, Journal of Finance, 11, 29–41 (2012).